<<Prev                                                   Home                        PDF                              Next>>
 
I still hear about the squabbles. As hard as it is for my old enviro pals to accept, there are still some insiders—moles if you will--- that keep me abreast. In San Juan County, the wilderness “coalition” is spending a good deal of time taking chunks out of each others’ asses. As it was explained to me by Deep Throat...let me see if I have this right---the Grand Canyon Trust wants a big chunk of acreage for wil­derness in San Juan County that will never be acceptable to either the locals or to the Obama administration and also wants to expand the boundaries of Canyonlands National Park.
SUWA will go along with park expansion as long as ev­eryone stays on board with their “Red Rock Wilderness” bill, despite the fact that the Obama administration has clearly stated it does not support it. (See the June/July 2010 Zephyr:)
Several Utah airport tarmacs where SUWA board members park their Gulfstream jets were also exempted from wilderness. “We believe in compromise,” the SUWA director explained. “This is simply proof that we can be fexible.”
When I had fnished reading his wistful goodbye, it felt like a death in the family, though I haven’t seen Dick Carter in decades and we’ve only corresponded occasionally. But I had always taken comfort in knowing that he and Margaret were out there, being true to themselves and to the land they love.
I could not also help but think that in the not too distant future, his sentiments may be mine as well. As if they are not already.
Like Dick, I have no idea what I’m doing with this thing called The Zephyr anymore. Other than being a gathering place of sorts for other frustrated souls, I fail to see our rel­evance either.
“...we are fairly certain the Temple itself does not have all the components for wilderness.... we just don’t think there’s enough soli­tude in the Celestial Room.”
I don’t see anyone in the mainstream media really addressing the issues confronting the country and the planet and I am tired of hitting my head against a wall. These are not ordinary times---so much is at stake. Everything, in fact, is at stake. Yet, I don’t see any real urgency out there, or honesty or candor, from anybody. Left or Right. I see a lot of cosmetics and gimmicky ‘solutions.’ Nothing more.
Society itself has become little more than a high tech media circus. Warhol was right–with facebook and Twit­ter, everyone gets their 15 minutes. Everybody performs but nobody listens. Both ‘sides’ play to their own people, their own audience, oblivious to the notion that a long look in the mirror might be enlightening and constructive. We exhibit a relentless partisan intractability against our ad­versaries and an unwaivering blind allegiance to our allies, where dissent is somehow mistaken for treason.
In the last months of his life, Abbey came to be disillu­sioned with everyone, even his ‘allies.’ He called it “chick-enshit liberalism.” That was 1989; he should see it now.
In 2010, the corruption and banality of environmen-talism and “progressives” is beyond my comprehension. There are no idealists left. I don’t know who the ‘good guys’ are anymore.
Meanwhile, anti-wilderness advocate Brian Haw­thorne, former director of AccessUSA and the leader of the Blue Ribbon Panel for Open Access offered his orga­nization’s own proposal at a similarly near-empty press conference in Cedar City.
“Our people have been out there on their ATVs; we’ve gone up one side of the state and down the other, and we’ve been able to locate 317 acres of real wilderness. That’s what our inventory says.”
Hawthorne identifed the inaccessible pinnacles of nu­merous rock spires and monuments throughout the state, including several well-known climbing rocks near Moab, Utah as “possibly having wilderness characteristics ...we couldn’t get our ATVs up them, so they must be wilder­ness. Otherwise we stand by our count.”
Hawthorne refused to discuss a recent Blue Ribbon in­ternal memo that called for the removal and transfer of Utah’s famed Delicate Arch to a more accessible location. “Let’s just say we believe in equal access and leave it at that.”
In the early 1990s, pro- and anti-wilderness forces lined up along respective acreages of 5.4 million acres versus 1.3 million acres. Today that gap has grown signifcantly. Has this difference of opinion infamed the public?
A Dan Jones poll in the Deseret News says not. Of the 1345 Utah citizens polled over the wilderness issue, 76% replied, “Don’t care,” “Don’t know enough to answer,” or “Never heard of wilderness.”
The Nature Conservancy opposes park expansion be­cause it could jeopardize their operations at Dugout Ranch (The ranch was donated to TNC by Heidi Redd, provided it was maintained as a working ranch.) Consequently the GCT and SUWA are mad at TNC and are holding private meetings without them.
Meanwhile, The Wilderness Society (TWS) is ignoring the other groups and is working directly with state and lo­cal offcials to create a bill that will actually pass in Con­gress. The other groups say TWS is selling out.
Would the late Cal Black
(Ed Abbey’s “Bishop Love” in
The Monkey Wrench Gang)
have ever dreamed that his county
might be promoting its natural wonders
and begging for tourist dollars
on National Public Radio?
In 2010, the corruption and banality
of environmentalism and
“progressives” is beyond
my comprehension.
There are no idealists left.
I don’t know who the ‘good guys’
are anymore.
And yet, the far Right-wing anti-wilderness advocates are just as delighted as their adversaries on the Left to see the legislation bog down. Perpetually locked in “sagebrush rebel mode,” few are willing to acknowledge that even con­servatives in San Juan County have embraced the recre­ation/amenities economy touted by environmentalists.
Would the late Cal Black (Ed Abbey’s “Bishop Love” in The Monkey Wrench Gang) have ever dreamed that his county might be promoting its natural wonders and beg­ging for tourist dollars on National Public Radio?
And could he have foreseen his home town, Blanding, proclaim itself, “Your Base Camp to Adventure?” Every time I drive into Blanding and see the big welcome sign sporting that logo, I remember the good old days, a few de­cades ago, when my “Drain Lake Powell” bumper sticker got me pulled over by the local cops on a regular basis. The mind boggles.
Watching the two ends of the wilderness debate spec­trum, it’s interesting to note that intractability is their most notable shared trait. In fact, these people have more in common than they’d ever dare to admit.
So now what? I can almost see the headlines---20 years from now...
Clearly, the debate will continue, even if nobody else no­tices.
DICK CARTER says ‘FARE THEE WELL’
I received word a couple weeks ago that Dick Carter and Margaret Pettis are shutting down their environmental group, High Uintas Preservation Council, after almost 20 years. Dick’s poignant “Fare thee well” note struck some sensitive chords with me.
When I moved to Utah, more than 30 years ago, Dick’s name was one of the frst I became familiar with. Before environmentalists had to be lawyers and litigators to get a job in “the movement,” Dick was a conservationist who wore his humanity on his sleeve. He reached out to people who disagreed with him. He enjoyed dialogue and discus­sion. Dick was passionate and compassionate. He hoped for consensus and resolution.
But it’s been a quarter century since the greens began to bicker and fght one another. Dick’s conciliatory approach to wilderness made him a pariah to many. The Utah hard­liners all but drove him out the door. The animosity toward him was stunning.
I recall at the time being bewildered by the rancor; hon­estly, I didn’t agree with all of Dick’s ideas but didn’t feel I needed to hate him as well. This is a man who stopped and sent me a personal letter of sympathy when Dick heard my old dog Muckluk had died. How can anyone loathe a man with a heart like that?
In his “fare thee well” comments, Dick expressed some of his frustrations...
At a time when the planet itself is at risk, who do we turn to for inspiration? When environmental leaders in Utah publicly state: “Perhaps in the 21st Century, idealism is no longer applicable,” (and one did say that in 2008), then we are in big trouble.
If there was ever a time for real, genuine heroes, it’s NOW. Yet most people are ignorant of and even seduced by the deception. They see a public image manufactured by marketing campaigns and slick ads and media consultants that have nothing to do with earned respect. Or ethics. Or heartfelt values. Where is the heart and soul of environ-mentalism nowadays?
Mainstream environmentalists, funded by billionaire capitalists/industrialists, argue with straight faces that capitalism and increased profts and an expanding GDP are compatible with a healthy planet!
In most cases, even the most radical among us remain silent to the hypocrisy.
So what to do? Who really cares? How many times has The Zephyr already expressed its outrage in the last de­cade to thundering indifference?
I think this is an honest publication, and we’ve certainly paid a price for it. We’ve been trying to offer a non-partisan view, but I admit, when the bigger newspapers and maga­zines manage to ignore these issues, and when readers take comfort in their own non-involvement, it gets to the point where I feel like a broken record.
Recently, on The Zephyr facebook page, I enjoyed reading and participating in a long and constructive discussion that began when I posted an old Abbey quote about “Yuppie liberalism.” And yet, throughout the long comment thread, some readers either urged me to “keep up the good fght,” or else they lamented the fact that Abbey was gone. “Where is Abbey when we need him?” one asked.
Well Abbey has been gone for 21 years. He can’t come back and speak on our behalf. All those who miss Abbey... THEY need to be the voice. And even Abbey’s words are pointless if they don’t inspire all of US to speak out. If everyone is fed up with the hypocrisy that comes from ‘OUR SIDE,’ posting a facebook comment is worthless.. Don’t tell me. Don’t think venting on facebook is going to make a difference. TELL THEM. Tell our leaders that you’re disappointed—that you demand a return to honest idealism and leadership that’s rooted in integrity and candor, not the cynical, phony, slick “leadership” we see today.
Ultimately, all this publication can do is give you infor­mation and heartfelt opinions. What you do with that in­formation is completely up to you.
THE BATTLE OVER UTAH WILDERNESS CONTINUES: 2030
(Salt Lake City–July 20, 2030) It’s diffcult to imagine but both opponents and proponents of a Utah BLM Wil­derness bill have been fghting over legislation for 50 years, and some wonder if this impasse will ever be bro­ken. After half a century of bickering is there light at the end of the tunnel?
Scott Groene, longtime director of the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance (SUWA) believes the time has come.
At a sparsely attended press conference, Groene an­nounced that SUWA and the Utah Wilderness Coalition were on the verge of a major breakthrough. “We believe that after our latest citizens’ inventory, we have a real handle on the wilderness that’s still out there.”
Groene told a stunned audience that the new Coalition inventory reveals more than 66 million acres of available wilderness in Utah. “Yes,” Groene replied to questions, “ I am well aware that the number is more than the total amount of acreage in the entire state, but we really don’t believe that should be an impediment to this bill. We sim­ply included properties in other states that are owned by Utah residents.”
Rod Decker, the senior correspondent for KUTV in Salt Lake City asked if it were true that SUWA includes Temple Square in its wilderness inventory.
“That is mostly true,” Groene said guardedly, “but we are going to allow some cherry stemming of Temple Square sidewalks and we are fairly certain the Temple itself does not have all the components for wilderness.... we just don’t think there’s enough solitude in the Celestial Room.”
After a great deal of thought, we have decided the High Uintas Preservation Council can offer no more hope, guid­ance or wild voice. Fifteen years and there is simply no more left.
...Of late, the environmental/conservation movement has just left me behind. It is a vastly different movement with a deeply different psychology, different expectations and engaged in a very different manner than was my ex­perience. Conversation is not expected nor sought. Little blobs of light flter through now and again but we have been unable to shed that light on a hopeful path
...We are simply not real players.
...In the end a person pushing and pulling this kind of an organization has got to believe our voices are more than simple bearing witness. I can no longer get over that bar­rier. Bearing witness may be all we can really do and may be the most important thing we can do, but it can’t be the impetus for an organization like HUPC.
...So, keep it simple, thank you over and over, again and again. Let’s hope wildness can fnd its footing.