THE LEFT & RIGHT: SHARING A COMMON CONSPIRACY THEORY
I recently received an email from a reader
of our web site. His plea was simple. Reuben said:
WAKE UP! IT'S CALLED "TOO MANY PEOPLE"!
IT'S OVERPOPULATION! Why does the entire country suffer from this mass
blindness? People 30 years ago could see that overpopulation is driving
all the other problems.
It's interesting he should pick the number
"30". Thirty years ago, almost to the day, the Club of Rome
identified the principal problem facing this planet as "Unsustainable
Growth". Thirty years ago the twin solutions of "Sustainable
Growth" and "Sustainable Development" were identified
as the only solutions ACCEPTABLE to the 'elite' few who control world
politics and who determine global international policies. And so for
the past 30 years these twin solutions have absolutely dominated the
political, environmental and corporate agenda.
Most people simply never understood what
was going on. If anyone cares to research the 'conspiracy theory' behind
this issue as presented by the far-right, you will discover that they
attribute the Club of Rome findings, the international efforts which
deal with (or fair to deal with) population control, and the promotion
of a multinational--ecosustainable--elitist-- socialistic future to
a single person. That person is David Rockefeller acting through a great
many organizations over which he presides such as the Council on Foreign
Relations, the Trilateral Commission, the World Economic Forum, etc...
I'd suggest that these conspiracy folks are on the right track.
Their interpretation is, as is usually the
case, greatly distorted by their need to fit their observations within
a model that works for them ideologically - but if you examine the data
that has attracted their attention and re-interpret it using your own
value system, you just might reach a set of conclusions that works well
FOR YOU. I suggest that these conspiracy folks have done a remarkably
good job of identifying the correct smoking gun. They are pointing to
evidence that could answer the question Reuben asked---namely: "why
is virtually no one paying attention to the population problem."
Their explanations may miss the mark by
a country mile, but missing by a mile is coming closer than much of
the environmental community or the so-called progressive community has
come. And there's a reason for that. Ask yourself who funds the corporatized
environmental community and what do these funders expect/demand for
their investment? Who/What is PEW? Who are the Rockefellers? Who are
the MacArthurs, the Motts, the W. Alton Jones, etc??? Where do their
fortunes come from? How where these fortunes amassed? What are the ideological
beliefs of the founders of these foundations? AND knowing the answers
to all of the above, what specifically can you believe/accept these
foundations truly hope to accomplish through their philanthropy? (ie.,
cutting through the crap, what do these foundations really want!?)
There are a great many right-wingers who
have asked these questions. Their data is generally good, their interpretations
are often turned inside out to my way of thinking. There are likewise
a handful of progressive (left-wing) thinkers who have asked these same
questions and who have provided answers for all to discover, test, accept
or reject as people so desire. The clear, progressive, thinkers are
Mark Dowie, Brian Tokar, Jeff St. Clair, Kenny Bruno, William Greider,
and a few others. In the smallest of possible nutshells, these people
say that the reason mainstream environmentalism avoids such issues as
over-population is because these big-greens have been bought off by
the corporate foundations who themselves seek ways AROUND the "Limits
to Growth" as documented in the Club of Rome report 30 years ago.
Collectively these foundations and Captains
of Corporate America seek to expand the limits to growth by finding
techno-fixes that will allow for (will actually facilitate) a growing
population of unfettered consumers while ensuring the (pseudo)-survival
of the planet in spite of this growing population.
Some would say this is insanity---or, at
a minimum, is the wrong tact. Some would call it a "win-win".
Some would say that we have an overpopulation problem that must be dealt
with directly. But, as Reuben pointed out, you do not hear that message
from the Big-Greens or from the United Nations, or from Corporate America
and the media that they control/own. And clearly there is an explanation
for this too. There always is an explanation. Chance rarely counts in
the game of politics.
Those curious to explore this issue might
find it rewarding to look amongst the writings of the writers identified
above and to explore the right-wing writings which pertain to the New
World Order and The Global Environmental Agenda. If you do, you might
conclude that those on the right and on the left have identified and
focused their attention upon the very same smoking gun. "Sustainable
Growth" is, I would suggest, the most important issue defining
global policies/politics today. Those believing in one political ideology
refer to this as "Globalization", those from the opposite
ideology call it "New World Order". Imagine what might happen
if those from opposite ideologies tried to learn from each other! Imagine
the perspective that could be gained by combining the observations of
those seeing to the Left of the corporate filter with those seeing to
the Right of that same filter.
Globalization/NWO is the umbrella issue
which enshrouds and envelops all other environmental issues. Population
is simply one of the issues subsumed within the issue of Globalization/NWO.
How we deal with Globalization/NWO during the next 10-20 years will
determine the fate of humanity. If we don't deal with it effective and
correctly, we will end up paying a steep price for our failures. Our
continued failure to confront the population issue, ensures our failure
as a species.
Scott Silver/Wild Wilderness
248 NW Wilmington Ave. Bend, OR 97701
phone: 541-385-5261
e-mail: ssilver@wildwilderness.org
Internet: http://www.wildwilderness.org