<<Prev Home PDF Next>> |
||
|
||
OVERPOPULATION & LIBERAL TABOOS
IN THE LANDS OF ENTITLEMENT
BY SCOTT THOMPSON SHTHOMPSON1@SUDDENLINK.NET
You’re damn right there’s an immigration problem in Arizona: far too many white people have been emigrating there.
If
you doubt that, here are the numbers: while the Hispanic population in
Arizona increased by 856,000 between 1980 and 2006, the white
population escalated by 1.2 million. (Population Brief for the State
of Arizona, Western Rural Development Center 2008, p.2).
Yet
we don’t hear about Latinos in Arizona strutting around in the dry
heat, demanding that the white folks move back where they came from.
Why is that?
The
reason is good ole white entitlement—an attitude that has complicated
if not contaminated the touchy subject of overpopulation. I know more
about white entitlement than I care to, having grown up in the small
town South before the civil rights movement took hold. The year I spent
in Mississippi in 1962 is burned into my mind like as if from a
branding iron. And even though the right wing is (offcially) no longer
racist, sometimes I hear the same tone of self-satisfed superiority and
indignant outrage in the voices of
petuate
it, is that it is the one attitude that will make resolving this great
problem of overpopulation impossible. If people fear that the call to
reduce our numbers is merely a ruse to weaken them in the face of an
enemy, their willingness to cooperate will disintegrate.
Unfortunately,
Latinos have grounds to fear just such an attitude. Consider, for
example, the recent Arizona statute (Senate Bill 1070) that will
inexorably lead to the racial profling of Latinos who are American
citizens in order to locate “illegal immigrants.”
But
not all entitlement is about racial, ethnic, or cultural prejudice.
When it comes to overpopulation, there are diverse layers of
entitlement spread out among different groups. Challenging them all is
what makes me want to drink twelve Budweisers at the end of the day
(and I gave all that up a long time ago).
I
would like to explain what’s driving me to get into the turd-laden
issue of overpopulation. It’s this: in the late 1960s I fell in love
with Arizona. The way it was before its developers, business tycoons,
and state leaders systematically destroyed it with their culturally
sanctioned avarice. It was as though they had tied a Javelina to a
stake and scourged it
those who fairly spit out the words “illegal immigrants.”
Within
these words lies the assumption that we Americans have some righteous
claim to the lands comprising Arizona and the Southwest, when the facts
plainly show that’s bullshit. That attitude does remind me of the white
people in Mississippi in 1962, who thought they were entitled to the de
facto slave labor of the African Americans living there.
The
only, repeat only, reason all that land is within the territorial
United States is because we stole it at gunpoint from Mexico. Which in
turn took it from Spain, which stole it from Native Americans, some of
whom stole it from other Native Americans.
It’s quite a daisy chain.
with tendrils of hairline glass, all the while thinking, hey, this is what good people do.
You don’t forget witnessing something like that.
Edward
Abbey had a similar experience. In 1959 he rafted through Glen Canyon
on “the golden, fowing Colorado River,” to use his words. Later he
worked there as a seasonal park ranger. Ed knew the river and the
canyon before Glen Canyon Dam stopped it up like a vast, stinking
toilet. He said, “The difference between the present reservoir, with
its silent sterile shores and debris-choked side canyons, and the
original Glen Canyon, is the difference between death and life. Glen
Canyon was alive. Lake Powell is a graveyard.” (The Damnation of a
Canyon, pp. 1,3).
Ed loved Glen Canyon the way it was.
In the late 1960s Arizona was a shifting, turning mosaic
A brief recounting of how America came to possess the Southwest is instructive. In
1846
President James K. Polk concocted an excuse for invading Mexico in
order to grab as much of their land as he could get his hands on. Some
members of Congress did have the integrity to question the necessity
for war—among them a young, gangling Abraham Lincoln.
of
brilliant colors; everywhere there were crystalline expanses of space
and light; the outline of a mountain peak 80 miles away was as clear
and sharp as the verdant trunk of a paloverde that you touched with
your fngers.
Arizona
was: the pervasive beige of the sun-blasted Sonoran Desert outside
Tucson, studded with enormous green stalks of Saguaro cacti; the red
and gold evening light atop etched black horizons; the state roads
heading north, twisting into sharp green blankets of juniper and pinyon
pine and red striped sandstone; the rough black lava rocks and the
sweet smooth lava cone near Flagstaff, adorned with spare, regal stands
of Ponderosa Pine; the burnt-brown edge of the Mojave Desert, stippled
with rough-barked Joshua trees, their limbs curving into clusters of
spines.
My
microbiologist mother frst drove me from Tucson to the Navajo
Reservation when I was 18. I had no language of description for the
Navajo world; I just called it “the place
You’re damn right
there’s an immigration problem
in Arizona:
far too many white people
have been emigrating there.
we Americans are in no position to wax indignant
about “illegal immigrants” from Mexico
entering the Southwest,
given that we stole that land from them
in the frst place.
But
as is true with power-hungry people, Polk would not be stopped. The
crushing blow to Mexico was delivered by General Winfeld Scott, who in
1847 invaded the port city of Veracruz and marched toward Mexico City,
which he took after six months of brutal fght-ing. Scott himself
admitted that his soldiers had “committed atrocities to make Heaven
weep and every American of Christian morals blush for his country.”
Translation: they slaughtered civilians.
In
the end, the United States paid Mexico $27 million for all that land—a
farcical sum in order to whitewash its dishonorable aims.
The
great Henry David Thoreau spent a night in jail to protest the taxes to
support this war, and then went to his cabin to pen his classic essay,
“Civil Disobedience,” which championed an individual’s right to oppose
an immoral government. Gandhi himself was later inspired by this essay.
(See the textbook Out of Many: A History of the American People, by
Faragher et al, 2005, pp. 416-419).
In
short: we Americans are in no position to wax indignant about “illegal
immigrants” from Mexico entering the Southwest, given that we stole
that land from them in the frst place.
For the irony-challenged reader: I am NOT talking about giving the land back to Mexico. This is about attitude.
with
no telephone poles.” It took me a long time to fnd the words for what I
discovered there: that once beyond the telephone wires I was in a
sacred land, and that these people knew something about the power of
the landscape that my own culture had lost.
In 1971 my mother died of heart failure in Holbrook, Arizona, while driving to the sacred land.
Now here’s what tripling the population of Arizona in less than a generation did.
In
the summer of 2005, as Gail and I few into Sky Harbor Airport in
Phoenix, we glided over forty contiguous miles of tract houses; the
many thousands of tiny yards and blue dotted swimming pools were packed
against each other like cells in a massive tumor. We
The reason I have written frst about racial or ethnic entitlement, whoever may per-
|
||