THE CONTRADICTIONS OF OUR LIVES
This issue has been in the works since last summer. As a gnawing
dull pain in the back of my conscience, it's been around for years.
I suspect that anyone who lives here and makes a living here, and actually
thinks from time to time, knows the kind of ache I refer to.
We live in one of the most beautiful places on Earth. Many of
us moved to Moab years ago, or decades ago, against the advice and approval
of our friends and elders who said, "How in the hell are you going
to make a living out there in the middle of that desert? Pretty sunsets
don't pay the rent, boy!"
But we moved here anyway, took our chances, downsized our expectations
of material wealth, and took pleasure in those precious intangible assets
that many others failed to see.
Now we sit in a new century, and my friends and I are part of
the Moab Establishment. We own homes, businesses, some have families,
and almost all of us are connected, in some way, to the very same tourist
economy that we've also come to loathe.
It is a strange and troubling contradiction. A love-hate relationship
that often tears away at the very principles and values we hold most
dear. We came here 20 years ago, embarrassingly self-righteous and blinded
by the black and white simplicity of idealistic youth. We came here
to save the canyon country.
We in the environmental community essentially declared war on
the traditional abuses of public land--grazing, logging, mining--the
extractive industries that have honestly wreaked havoc on the red rock
country for a century. There were so few of us here then, just a handful
by today's standards, that our own impacts on the land--our non-motorized
recreational activities--didn't worry any of us.
But it should have. We should have seen what was coming and we
didn't. We were simply the vanguard of a staggering demographic shift
and a cultural and recreational revolution. Our hip little Moab Minority
helped pave the way for what has happened since. Across the West there
are other Hip Minorities who did the same for other small towns in what
we now call the New West.
In 1950, the population of all the western states, save California,
was 17 million. By 2000 the number had jumped to more than 50 million.
The population of the U.S is projected by some to reach 400 million
by the middle of this century and the growth will not be equally distributed.
Indeed, the New West sits on the verge of an explosive change that is
almost beyond our comprehension and we must deal with it.
To me, we environmentalists have failed to come to terms with
the changes and grim promise of a very crowded future. We must be willing
to come forth and say: WE ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM.
Recently an editorial in the Salt Lake Tribune suggested
that, "...while they (environmentalists) were battling the cattle
ranchers, oil drillers and loggers, they overlooked another threat that
can wipe out an area's wild character as effectively as a clear-cut:
Themselves."
To me, it at least offered an opportunity for some honest soul-searching.
But the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance's response was, to me, discouraging.
"While we agree that all of us have an impact on the land,"
SUWA's newsletter replied, "the difference between hiking and
clear-cutting is profound. Implying otherwise suggests deep-seated,
dogmatic opposition to the efforts of environmentalists."
From dogmatic to disingenuous. Of course, we all know
the difference between a clear-cut and a footprint. But how about a
billion footprints? Or ten billion? How about well-intentioned, self-proclaimed
environmentalists moving by the millions into the ever-dwindling habitat
of the ever-encroached wildlife? How about the exploitation of wildlands
by a whole spectrum of non-motorized recreational entrepreneurs who
can gain absolution from environmental groups by making a generous donation
or by paying lip service support to a particular piece of environmental
legislation?
Or how about a funky little bi-monthly publication that complains
about all these abuses and yet survives on the advertising revenues
of some of those very same companies?
My own contradictions are enough to give me insomnia. On the
one hand, I feel relieved in a way that years ago, my own big mouth
ran off the BIG ADs like McDonald's and Burger King. I've never had
to worry about conflicts of conscience on a grand scale. I never refused
their ads--my own editorial expressions kept them away in the first
place.
But the contradictions linger. My pal Joe Kingsley, who is currently
mad at me again because of the "Moab's Beloved Junk" issue,
told me I'm a hypocrite because I complain about tourism and then make
money off tourist-based companies.
What can I say? He's right. My policy has always been that anybody
can advertise, but that none of them should expect me to alter an opinion
to appease them. "It's not like I'm holding a gun to their heads,"
I told Joe. "If they don't like The Zephyr, they can get
out." So he did.
But it certainly doesn't absolve me. For example, I despise guide
books--I think they're ruining some of the last best "secret places"
in SE Utah. Yet half my advertisers must sell some kind of a guidebook.
And without exception the businesses that sell the books are good people
trying to make a living. The contradictions are excruciating. All many
of us can say in our defense is that we came here to make a living,
not a killing, and that most of us don't want to see this community
completely grow beyond recognition, even if it means we drive the same
car for a decade and eat beans in the winter. We try to do the best
we can and hope we can live with our own consciences.
So what happens next? There is a dangerous contradiction just
waiting to be exploited when someone suggests that the drawbridge to
the town needs to be raised, now that we're on the right side of it.
But the truth is, if 20,000 potential immigrants look at our town of
9000, and they all decide to move here, it won't be a little town of
9000 anymore will it? Maybe some of us will have to leave, in order
to make room for others.
But one thing is certain. Environmentalists can no longer ignore
the invasion around us and pretend it's still 1975. The times have changed
and the culture has changed. "Wilderness" is still just as
important as it ever was, but saving this land is so much more than
that. One of my friends put it best: "When the population of Utah
grows so much and changes so much that its Senators actually want
a big wilderness bill, it'll only be because we yuppies moved in and
took over the state...and that's when I'd have to leave."
Isn't that weird? And I'd be right behind him.
KUER has lost its mind
As long as we're on the topic of human error and confession,
I'd like to encourage the management of KUER-FM in Salt Lake City to
come clean, admit they've made a horrendous mistake and return Gene
Pack and classical music to the airwaves. On March 16, Utah's public
radio station suddenly and without warning, terminated classical music
from its format and ended the on-air 42 year career of Gene Pack. According
to reports in the Salt Lake Tribune, Mr. Pack was given 48 hours
notice.
WHAT WERE YOU GUYS THINKING? Even for a news junkie like myself,
I can only take so much grim information. After surviving "Morning
Edition," I found the music and Gene's comforting voice a welcome
respite from Reality, even as I grimly went about my own business, dealing
with the news in SE Utah.
I'm not a classical music buff; in fact, I'm pretty damn classically-ignorant,
but the music and Gene Pack were a vital part of my day. Familiar friends.
PLEASE, KUER...Bring back Gene. He is "what you do
best."
THAT GOOFY LETTER FROM THE 'FIENDS'
The day after I left Moab for Australia, the very day after
I left, almost all of my advertisers received an unsigned letter
with the title, "A Letter from Friends of The Zephyr." Its
anonymous authors had a very strange way of expressing their deep affection
for me. (If you'd like to read the 'Letter,' it's on the web site,
in the archives section, in the
December 2000/January 2001 issue).
The letter was, in reality, an ill-conceived, poorly written
attempt to misrepresent the opinions and philosophy expressed in this
publication, and, by doing so, its unknown authors hoped to seriously
damage The Zephyr's advertising base.
Didn't work. And good grief, these knuckleheads couldn't even
spell my name correctly. For future reference, it's "St-I-les,
not "Styles." Anyway, nice try, kids. I'm flattered that
you took so much time and effort to be so small-minded.
Anyway, thanks to the miracle of the internet and email, I was
able to write a response to the 'Letter' almost immediately and thanks
to Zephyr staffer Sasa Woodruff, who was in Moab to print copies
of the reply and mail them, everyone who had received the boneheaded
junk mail received my reply within 72 hours.
Now, all these months later, it still amazes me that some people
in this town can be so petty---and by the way, I KNOW WHO YOU ARE---despite
your efforts, Moab is still a small town and as they used to say in
the Big War, "Loose lips sink ships."
The truth is, I always appreciate and even enjoy a frank exchange
of ideas and have no problem including opinions that are at odds with
my own, just as long as you sign the damn letter. But I think it might
be worth it to track the history of this publication's opinions on the
issue of growth and development and its effects on the well-being of
our community. I've been writing about this subject for 12 years now
and it is interesting, if nothing else, to go back through the files
and follow the changes in Moab as they happened.
Of course, it's impossible to re-print all those back issues
and editorials. But, once again, there is the internet. So we've set
up a new web site, not only to include a chronology of this town's recent
history as seen through The Zephyr, but to also make it very
clear that The Zephyr supports Progress for Moab. Progress means
finding a better life and trying to understand Life and all its variables.
Progress. So the new web site is:
www.promoab.com
That's 'pro' for Progress
We hope to have the site up very soon. You will be able to go
directly to the site or link to it through The Zephyr's web site.
HOW ABOUT A LITTLE TUNE?
So I was 12,000 miles away, sitting in a paddock listening to
kookaburras while hundreds of ants swarmed all over my feet, and I was
feeling a bit annoyed by all this 'Friends of the Zephyr' crap. I come
all the way out here to Boyup Brook, a damn sheep town, I complained
to myself, a hemisphere away from home and I still can't get clear of
the bullshit. Even the radio antics of Ted Bull on the ABC couldn't
brighten my day. But then I went into town for a Frosty Fruit and a
look around and a chance stroll into a second hand store changed my
life.
I bought a harmonica.
"Is it used?" I asked.
"This is a second hand store, mate...what do you think?"
I examined the instrument carefully.
"So I guess there could be years and years of dried spit
in this thing, huh," I worried.
The man shrugged, "What's a bit of spit between old mates,
eh?"
How true. A bit of spit might be just what the doctor ordered.
So I laid out my multi-colored Aussie cash on the counter and walked
away with my previously-owned Hohner chrome-plated deluxe harmonica
and at least several decades of accumulated saliva.
Well, as it turns out, I'm a damn harmonica prodigy...a natural.
I have the Gift. From the moment I put my Hohner to my lips, I knew
we had always been destined to meet. Without even trying, I was playing
"Camptown Races" and "Shenandoa" and "The Red
River Valley" and, of course, "My Old Kentucky Home"
as if I wrote the tunes myself. Soon I was tapping my feet and it was
only the harmonica itself that kept me from grinning ear-to-ear. My
cares fell away like mulberry leaves in the autumn.
Nasty letters? Who cares? George Duh Bush is President of the
United States? Oh well. Shucks...he means well. I felt, for the first
time in years, true peace. Now, wherever I go, I carry my Hohner in
a pocketknife case on my belt, and when trouble brews, I just play a
tune. You should hear me do Beethoven; my rendition of "The Ode
to Joy" has been known to make people cry.